🔗 Share this article

Families of people buried in resting places vulnerable to shoreline retreat say that indecision over how to address the issue is creating unnecessary distress about the final resting places of their departed family.

An Impending Danger to Historic Churchyards

The council have identified three burial grounds in the communities of Happisburgh, Mundesley, and Trimingham as being at risk of being engulfed by the sea in the next few generations.

A newly published study on the issue details a series of options, from doing nothing to disinterring bodies and relocating them in more secure locations. Authorities say it is for local people to decide how to proceed.

“Right now we’re in limbo. It causes me distress. My parents intended this to serve as their last home, but it won't be because of the encroaching sea.”

Projections indicate at least a portion of one graveyard could be claimed by the waves in the next 80 years, but some residents worry it will happen far earlier. “I think it’s got less than 20 years, if you consider what’s happened in the last 30 years,” one said.

Haunted by the Ghosts of Eccles

A local business owner recalled a childhood visit to the neighbouring settlement of Eccles, which has almost entirely disappeared into the water, along with its church and graveyard.

“You could see human remains,” she said. “Some have this romantic idea that the deceased will just get carried away to sea. That is not the case. Individuals will collect remains as souvenirs and go plundering graves in search of treasures. It’s completely disrespectful.”

“I fear that the same thing that happened at Eccles will happen at Happisburgh and there’ll be bones on the shore. I would feel disgusted by that.”

A Soldier's Grave in Peril

Along the coast is situated the grave of a former paratrooper who died while working abroad. His mother expressed she could not sleep after discovering her son’s grave might one day be moved.

“It truly trouble me to think this may not remain his lasting home,” she said. “For us it’s an important place to go.”

In her view, new burials should cease but says it is premature to disturb current plots. “My preference for now is to do nothing and watch carefully, but an timely resolution must be made when a tipping point has been reached.”

Seeking Answers and Certainty

An absence of agreement over the timing and method to handle the problem has resulted in bereaved families feeling frustrated and worried.

Some are calling for more sea defences to delay the inevitable erosion and to permit funerals to continue for now. Others contend the moment for relocation is approaching.

“The situation is very emotive,” said one relative. “The council’s report was thorough, but now there’s confusion about how it is implemented. And all parties is washing their hands over who is accountable.”

A local official said the graveyards were owned and managed of the church authorities. “Ultimately it is up to them to decide the direction to take. We are here to help support them through that journey with residents.”

He added there was ample time to weigh all the choices. “This concerns decades before it starts to be lost.”

“There is no unified opinion on what should be done yet. We need productive community discussions to find the appropriate answers for each village.”

The possibility of the loss of the historic sites was described as one of “immense sadness for the area,” but faith leaders also referenced a belief in life after death, offering a theological perspective on the physical loss of hallowed earth.